Todd Roberts v. Springfield Utility Board

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202321-36052California773 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 12 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TODD ROBERTS, No. 21-36052

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:19-cv-01595-MC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD, a Public Body; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 6, 2023 Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Todd Roberts appeals certain evidentiary and discovery

orders, as well as the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants-

Appellees on his First Amendment prior restraint claim, Fourteenth Amendment

procedural due process claim, and state law retaliation claim brought pursuant to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Oregon Revised Statute 659A.230. The parties’ familiarity with the briefing and

record is assumed, and the applicable standards of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.