Graciela Manzo Valladares v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202321-70621California381 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 12 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRACIELA MANZO VALLADARES; et No. 21-70621 al., Agency Nos. A216-182-442 Petitioners, A216-182-443

A216-182-444

v. A216-182-445

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 10, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Graciela Manzo Valladares (Manzo), on behalf of herself and her three minor

children, natives and citizens of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing her appeal of an Immigration Judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.