Rojas Jimenez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202321-1284California289 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 12 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO ROJAS JIMENEZ, No. 21-1284

Petitioner, Agency No. A216-434-326

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 10, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Rojas Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal

from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)’s decision that declined to terminate removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Where, as here,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the BIA issues its own opinion, this Court reviews “only the BIA’s decision,

except to the extent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.