Gonzalez Velasquez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202322-305California352 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAY 12 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ROXANA MARICELA GONZALEZ No. 22-305

VELASQUEZ; DAYANA ANELISSE

CHAVEZ GONZALEZ Agency Nos. A208-976-144

A208-976-145

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 10, 2023** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, FLETCHER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Roxana Marciela Gonzalez Velasquez seeks review of an order of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ).

The IJ denied her applications for asylum (on which her minor child Dayana

Anelisse Chavez-Gonzalez is listed as a beneficiary), withholding of removal, and

relief under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.