Gilbert Saucillo v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202322-55560California1,081 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 12 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GILBERT SAUCILLO; JAMES R. No. 22-55560 RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 5:10-cv-00809-VAP-OP Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. MEMORANDUM*

SADASHIV MARES,

Objector-Appellant,

and

JOHN BURNELL; JACK POLLOCK,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

INCORPORATED; DOES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 10, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Objector-Appellant Sadashiv Mares appeals the district court’s approval of a

class action settlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.