Young

Young v. Longstaff CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 12, 2023H050172California642 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 5/12/23 Young v. Longstaff CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

TIM YOUNG, H050172

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 19-CV-03144)

v.

DEREK RAYMOND LONGSTAFF,

Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We resolve this case by memorandum opinion under California Standards of Judicial Administration, Title 8, Standard 8.1. (See also People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853–855.) Following a bench trial, the trial court found that appellant Derek Longstaff was in breach of contract and entered a judgment against him. Longstaff, representing himself here as he did in the trial court, appeals from that judgment. He contends the trial court erred in finding that respondent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.