Dean Rodriguez v. Shelly Matis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202320-16391California964 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 15 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEAN C. RODRIGUEZ, No. 20-16391

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01049-MCE-KJN v.

SHELLY MATIS; FRED FOULK, MEMORANDUM*

Warden; R. ST. ANDRE; JEFFREY A.

BEARD; MATTHEW CATE; MIKE D.

MCDONALD; D. PEDDICORD; W.

WILSON; KRAFT; J. FLAHERTY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 11, 2023**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and NR SMITH, Circuit Judges

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Dean Rodriguez, a California inmate, appeals from the district court’s

judgment, following a remand from this court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review the dismissal and summary judgment de novo,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.