Pedro Cortez-Arreola v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202320-72055California366 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 15 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO CORTEZ-ARREOLA, AKA No. 20-72055 Pedro Cortez, Agency No. A205-117-014 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 10, 2023** Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, HURWITZ, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Pedro Cortez-Arreola petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’s decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his application for

withholding of removal. We dismiss the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1), we may review a final order of removal only if

the petitioner “has exhausted all administrative remedies available to [him or her]

as of right.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.