In Re: James Keenan v. Thomas Curtin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202322-60007California768 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: JAMES W. KEENAN, No. 22-60007

Debtor, BAP No. 21-1021

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES W. KEENAN,

Appellant,

v.

THOMAS L. CURTIN,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Lafferty III, Spraker, and Faris, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted May 9, 2023** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: HURWITZ and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KANE,*** District Judge.

James Keenan appeals a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”)

affirming an order of the bankruptcy court denying his motion to enforce the

discharge provision of his Chapter 11 plan and to void a state court judgment. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and affirm.

1. This case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.