Astronics Electronic Systems Corp. v. Magicall, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 15 2023
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ASTRONICS ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS No. 22-35645
CORP.,
D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00729-TSZ Petitioner-Appellee,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MAGICALL, INC.,
Respondent-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 11, 2023** Seattle, Washington
Before: TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
MAGicALL, Inc. (MAGicALL) appeals from the district court’s order
denying its motion to vacate an arbitration award and granting Astronics Advanced
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Electronic Systems Corp.’s (AES) motion to confirm the award.1 We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(D), and review a
district court’s decision to confirm an…