Astronics Electronic Systems Corp. v. Magicall, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202322-35645California665 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 15 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ASTRONICS ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS No. 22-35645

CORP.,

D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00729-TSZ Petitioner-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MAGICALL, INC.,

Respondent-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 11, 2023** Seattle, Washington

Before: TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

MAGicALL, Inc. (MAGicALL) appeals from the district court’s order

denying its motion to vacate an arbitration award and granting Astronics Advanced

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Electronic Systems Corp.’s (AES) motion to confirm the award.1 We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(D), and review a

district court’s decision to confirm an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.