Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Carl Petrick

Good Law
68 F.4th 475
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202321-35504California10,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

R. Nelson, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD No. 21-35504

ROCKIES,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:19-cv-00332-

REP

v.

CARL PETRICK, his official capacity OPINION as Forest Supervisor for the Idaho Panhandle National Forests; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Ronald E. Bush, Magistrate Judge, Presiding ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD No. 21-35785

ROCKIES,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:21-cv-00244-

BLW

v.

UNITED STATES FOREST

SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; CARL PETRICK, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Idaho Panhandle National Forests,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 20, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Filed May 16, 2023

Before: Ryan D. Nelson, Danielle J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.