Velasquez

Velasquez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202322-71California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAURICIO VELASQUEZ, No. 22-71 Agency No. Petitioner, A093-294-069 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 10, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Mauricio Velasquez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA’s) order denying his motion to terminate and dismissing his

appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) decision denying cancellation of

removal and voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252, and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

1. Velasquez first argues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.