Timothy Taylor v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202322-16271California548 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY TAYLOR, No. 22-16271

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-07692-JSW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO; KEVIN SPORE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 12, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Timothy Taylor appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for leave to

amend his complaint brought against his former employer, the San Francisco

Department of Public Works (DPW), and Kevin Spore, a DPW supervisor. Taylor

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). originally sued the defendants for racial discrimination. After discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.