Vavrik

Vavrik v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202322-941California440 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCELO EMERSON No. 22-941

VAVRIK; ANDREIA VAVRIK,

Agency Nos. A210-018-051 Petitioners, A210-018-052

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 12, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT***, District Judge.

Petitioners Marcelo Emerson Vavrik and Andreia Vavrik are natives and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge of Maryland, sitting by designation. citizens of Brazil.1 They petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) order dismissing their applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.