Mondloch

Mondloch v. Bell CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2023F084407California2,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/16/23 Mondloch v. Bell CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

KATHLEEN MONDLOCH (BELL),

F084407

Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. F71486) v.

BETSY BELL, OPINION Respondent.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County. Shelly Seymour, Judge. Cyril Lawrence, Inc. and Cyril L. Lawrence for Appellant. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth and Christopher A. Kent for Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Franson, Acting P. J., Meehan, J. and Snauffer, J. Appellant Kathleen Mondloch (Bell) challenges the trial court’s award of $57,833 to her daughter, Betsy Bell (daughter), representing a one-sixth interest in the family home that was sold through a short sale in 2011. Our review of the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.