Mondloch
Mondloch v. Bell CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 5/16/23 Mondloch v. Bell CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
KATHLEEN MONDLOCH (BELL),
F084407
Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. F71486) v.
BETSY BELL, OPINION Respondent.
THE COURT*
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County. Shelly Seymour, Judge. Cyril Lawrence, Inc. and Cyril L. Lawrence for Appellant. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth and Christopher A. Kent for Respondent. -ooOoo-
* Before Franson, Acting P. J., Meehan, J. and Snauffer, J. Appellant Kathleen Mondloch (Bell) challenges the trial court’s award of $57,833 to her daughter, Betsy Bell (daughter), representing a one-sixth interest in the family home that was sold through a short sale in 2011. Our review of the record…