Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202322-1186California650 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARPREET SINGH, No. 22-1186 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-171-321 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 11, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Harpreet Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA’s) order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) decision

denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant

to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

1. We conclude substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.