eGumball

eGumball v. Merrick Bank Corp. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 2023G060853California7,794 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 5/17/23 eGumball v. Merrick Bank Corp. CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

EGUMBALL, INC.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G060853

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021-01216871)

MERRICK BANK CORPORATION, OPINION

et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, James L. Crandall, Judge. Reversed. Duane Morris, Paul J. Killion, C. Todd Norris, Michelle N. Khoury, Daniel G. Gurfein and James J. Regan for Defendant and Appellant Merrick Bank Corporation. Roxborough, Pomerance, Nye & Adreani and Gary A. Nye for Defendant and Appellant Paysafe Payment Processing Solutions, LLC. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.