In re Ja.O.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 2023E079651California2,845 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Mother has five children: A.C. (age 14), K.C. (age 12), J.C. (age 12), Je.O. (age

8), and Ja.O. (age 6).

On October 20, 2021, CFS received an immediate response referral from law

enforcement as to all five children. On October 21, 2021, CFS detained all five children

pursuant to a detention warrant. K.C. and J.C. were placed on an emergency basis in the

foster home of their stepmother, Susan. A.C., Je.O., and Ja.O. were placed on an

emergency basis in the foster home of nonrelative extended family members Sara and

Devin.

On October 25, 2021, section 300 petitions were filed for all five children,

containing allegations of sexual abuse, physical abuse, domestic violence, and substance

abuse. Attached to each petition is a Judicial Council form ICWA-010(A) stating that

Mother was asked by a CFS social worker about the child’s Indian status on October 20,

2 2021, and provided no reason to believe the child is or may be an Indian child.1 Also

attached to the petitions for Je.O. and Ja.O. were forms stating that their father, R.O.,

when asked on that same day, provided no reason to believe the child is or may be an

Indian child.

The detention hearing was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.