Valdovinos

Valdovinos v. McGrath

Good Law
598 F.3d 568·2010 WL 789536·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5015
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 201008-15918California6,300 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Petitioner-Appellant Felix Solorio Valdovinos appeals from the district court’s denial of his amended habeas corpus petition challenging his jury conviction of first degree murder. He contends that the government withheld potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and that his trial counsel’s performance fell below the level required under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Because a reasonable probability exists that the undisclosed Brady material could have altered the result of the proceeding, we reverse in part and remand with instructions to the district court to issue a writ of habeas corpus.

I.

On December 1, 1998, a jury convicted Valdovinos of the first degree murder of Nelson Caballero. On May 11, 1998, Caballero was shot outside a San Jose nightclub. The shooter fired two shots from a .380 caliber semi-automatic handgun, hitting Caballero once in the stomach and once in the head. The murder investigation ultimately led to the arrest of Valdovinos in Oregon in June 1998.

At trial, the prosecution relied heavily on eyewitness testimony implicating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.