In re Barraza CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2023F085875California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/18/23 In re Barraza CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re F085875

JOSE ALVARO BARRAZA, JR., (Tulare Super. Ct. No. PCF413779B)

On Habeas Corpus. OPINION

THE COURT

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Sandra Gilles, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. No appearance for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo- Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal. The Attorney General was given an opportunity to file opposition to the request and told that its failure to do so would be treated as consent to the requested relief being granted without further proceedings. The Attorney General failed to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.