Boyd

Boyd v. Freeman CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2023B316753California6,155 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 5/18/23 Boyd v. Freeman CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

PAULA BOYD, B316753

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC588216) v.

DAVID FREEMAN,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daniel S. Murphy, Judge. Affirmed. Paula Boyd, in pro. per.; Pollak, Vida & Barer, Daniel P. Barer, Hamed Amiri Ghaemmaghami for Plaintiff and Appellant. The Jamison Law Firm, Guy E. Jamison and Chelsea M. Clayton for Defendant and Respondent. In late 2005, respondent attorney David Freeman loaned $425,000 to appellant Paula Boyd, his then-client. Boyd defaulted on the loan in 2007, at which point Freeman initiated foreclosure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.