Boyd
Boyd v. Freeman CA2/4
Opinion
Opinion
Collins, J.
Filed 5/18/23 Boyd v. Freeman CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
PAULA BOYD, B316753
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC588216) v.
DAVID FREEMAN,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daniel S. Murphy, Judge. Affirmed. Paula Boyd, in pro. per.; Pollak, Vida & Barer, Daniel P. Barer, Hamed Amiri Ghaemmaghami for Plaintiff and Appellant. The Jamison Law Firm, Guy E. Jamison and Chelsea M. Clayton for Defendant and Respondent. In late 2005, respondent attorney David Freeman loaned $425,000 to appellant Paula Boyd, his then-client. Boyd defaulted on the loan in 2007, at which point Freeman initiated foreclosure…