Crescent Trust v. City of Oakland

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2023A162465MCalifornia10,020 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 5/18/23 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CRESCENT TRUST, A162465

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No.

CITY OF OAKLAND, RG20068131)

Defendant and Respondent.

ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND

DENYING

REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 23, 2023, be modified as follows: 1. On page 24: The second sentence in the second paragraph that reads, “And, as we have discussed, this was wholly consistent with the law then, and now, that multiple, separately described lots can be transferred by way of a single conveyance, such as a grant deed.” shall be modified to read, “And, as we have discussed, further legal research discloses that this was wholly consistent with the law then, and now, that multiple, separately described lots can be transferred by way of a single conveyance, such as a grant deed.”

1 2. On pages 24-25, the last sentence of the second paragraph should be modified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.