Keiron Elias v. A. Lichinov

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202321-56103California374 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEIRON MARQUETT ELIAS, No. 21-56103

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07457-MWF-JC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

A. LICHINOV, Correctional Officer, in

official and individual capacities,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Keiron Marquette Elias appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

excessive use of force, deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, and

violation of his right to free exercise of religion. We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.