Julius Engel v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202321-16834California366 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIUS M. ENGEL, No. 21-16834
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00893-JAM-JDP
and
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE
OF CALIFORNIA,
Intervenor-Plaintiffs,
v.
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 16, 2023**
Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Julius M. Engel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his action alleging various claims relating to his disbarment from the practice of
law in the State of California. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo. Seismic Reservoir 2020, Inc.…