Julius Engel v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202321-16834California366 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIUS M. ENGEL, No. 21-16834

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00893-JAM-JDP

and

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE

OF CALIFORNIA,

Intervenor-Plaintiffs,

v.

TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Julius M. Engel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his action alleging various claims relating to his disbarment from the practice of

law in the State of California. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Seismic Reservoir 2020, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.