Julius Engel v. State Bar of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202321-16835California407 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIUS M. ENGEL, No. 21-16835

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00624-DB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Client Security Fund Commission,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Deborah L. Barnes, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted May 16, 2023***

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Julius M. Engel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging various federal and state law claims in connection with

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). proceedings before the State Bar of California’s Client Security Fund…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.