Jaime

People v. Jaime

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 2023C096022California1,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 5/19/23

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

THE PEOPLE, C096022

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCCR-CRF- 2020-436) v.

MOISES JAMIE JAIME,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County, Anne Bouliane, Judge. (Retired judge of the S.F. Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Reversed.

William G. Holzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Julie A. Hokans and Robert Gezi, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 Before January 1, 2022, trial courts examined peremptory challenges under the three-step inquiry established by Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 and People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258. Recognizing the limitations of the Batson/Wheeler inquiry, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill No. 3070 (2019-2020 Reg. Sess.) (Assembly Bill…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.