George Austin v. Georgetown University

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202321-16191California400 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, No. 21-16191

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-05631-YGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY;

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW

CENTER ORGANIZATION; DOE,

Photographer Commissioned by Georgetown; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Federal Student Aid,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

George Jarvis Austin appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction his action alleging federal and state law

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). claims against Georgetown University and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.