George Austin v. Abc Legal

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202322-15929California398 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, No. 22-15929

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-09076-SI

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ABC LEGAL,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

George Jarvis Austin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging discrimination and defamation in violation of federal

and state laws. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Procedure 12(b)(6). Brunette v. Humane Soc. of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.