Josue Umana-Escobar v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202319-70964California4,803 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSUE UMANA-ESCOBAR, No. 19-70964

Petitioner, Agency No.

A205-474-027

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER AND General, AMENDED

OPINION

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted January 11, 2023 Pasadena, California

Filed March 17, 2023 Amended May 23, 2023

Before: Paul J. Watford, Michelle T. Friedland, and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges.

Order; Opinion by Judge Bennett 2 UMANA-ESCOBAR V. GARLAND

SUMMARY *

Immigration

The panel filed: 1) an order withdrawing the opinion filed March 17, 2023, and reported at 62 F.4th 1223 (9th Cir. 2023), replacing that opinion with a concurrently filed amended opinion and, with these amendments, denying the government’s motion to amend; and 2) an amended opinion denying in part and granting in part Josue Umana-Escobar’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, and remanding. In the amended opinion, the panel: (1) denied the petition as to Umana-Escobar’s unexhausted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.