Tyrell Erlebach v. Payette County Board of Commissioners

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202322-35213California319 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TYRELL CURTIS ERLEBACH, No. 22-35213

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00173-MDH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RAJ ENTERPRISES OF CENTRAL

FLORIDA, DBA Pinnacle Laboratories, DBA Pinnacle Laboratory Services, DBA Pinnacle Labs; JOSEPH JOHNSON; MILLS

BRINSON III,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho M. Douglas Harpool, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Tyrell Curtis Erlebach appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of

defendants RAJ Enterprises of Central Florida, Joseph Johnson, and Mills Brinson

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). III in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various claims. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.