Omar Elsoudy v. University of Arizona

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202322-15777California486 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OMAR MAHMOUD ELSOUDY, No. 22-15777

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00508-RCC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, in its official capacity; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Omar Mahmoud Elsoudy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal discrimination and retaliation claims,

violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), and state law claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wilhelm v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.