Indiezone, Inc. v. Joe Rogness
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202321-15344California517 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
INDIEZONE, INC., No. 21-15344
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-04280-VC
CONOR FENNELLY; DOUGLAS
RICHARD DOLLINGER, MEMORANDUM*
Appellants,
and
EOBUY, LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOE ROGNESS; TODD ROOKE,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
PHIL HAZEL; et al.,
Defendants.
INDIEZONE, INC., No. 21-16338
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-04280-VC
CONOR FENNELLY; DOUGLAS
RICHARD DOLLINGER,
Appellants,
and
EOBUY, LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOE ROGNESS; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 16, 2023**
Before: GRABER, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.