Darrin Espinosa v. Contra Costa County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202322-15130California403 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARRIN ESPINOSA, No. 22-15130

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-08055-JSW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Darrin Espinosa appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his employment action alleging disability discrimination under the Americans

with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Fair Employment and Housing

Act (“FEHA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo. Shelley v. Geren, 666 F.3d 599, 604 (9th Cir. 2012). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.