Thomas Oliver v. Kristin Mihelic

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202322-55229California777 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS OLIVER, No. 22-55229

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01807-LL-DEB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KRISTIN T. MIHELIC; TIFFANY L.

CARROLL; LOUISE DECARL ADLER;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Linda Lopez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Oliver appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleging claims arising out of his bankruptcy proceeding. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.