Thomas Oliver v. Kristin Mihelic
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202322-55229California777 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS OLIVER, No. 22-55229
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01807-LL-DEB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
KRISTIN T. MIHELIC; TIFFANY L.
CARROLL; LOUISE DECARL ADLER;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Linda Lopez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 16, 2023**
Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Thomas Oliver appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”),
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleging claims arising out of his bankruptcy proceeding. We…