Napitupulu

Napitupulu v. Mad Science Laboratories CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2023B317570California2,210 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/23/23 Napitupulu v. Mad Science Laboratories CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

JONATHAN NAPITUPULU, B317570

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC129321) v.

MAD SCIENCE LABORATORIES,

LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, H. Jay Ford, III, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Gene H. Shioda, Gene H. Shioda and James A. Kim for Plaintiff and Appellant. Kingfisher Law, Nithin Kumar; Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, Ekwan E. Rhow and Thomas R. Freeman for Defendant and Respondent.

______________________________ This appeal involves a wage claim by appellant Jonathan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.