Patkins

Patkins v. Piantini CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2023E077938California1,981 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/26/23 Patkins v. Piantini CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DAVID C. PATKINS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E077938

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1504254)

REBECA PIANTINI, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Brian S.

McCarville, Judge. Affirmed.

David C. Patkins, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

1 This opinion constitutes this court’s third time addressing this case. 1 In the last

appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s denial of the request of plaintiff and appellant

David C. Patkins (Plaintiff) for entry of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.