Ramos Lopez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202321-133California539 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRA SENAIDA RAMOS LOPEZ; et No. 21-133 al., Agency Nos.

A208-418-155

Petitioners,

A208-418-156

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Sandra Senaida Ramos Lopez and her minor son, natives and citizens of

Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision

denying their application for asylum and Ramos Lopez’s applications for

withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.