Lizama-Hernandez

Lizama-Hernandez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202321-197California367 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTA LEA LIZAMA-HERNANDEZ; et No. 21-197 al., Agency Nos.

A209-840-541

Petitioners,

A209-840-542

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Marta Lea Lizama-Hernandez and her minor daughter1, natives and

citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal as abandoned. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The Clerk will amend the docket to add petitioner’s daughter Britanny Nallely Romero-Lizama (A209-840-524) as a petitioner in this case, in accordance with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.