Saul Pelayo v. B. Greer
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202322-15223California392 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SAUL PELAYO, No. 22-15223
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-04135-RS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
B. GREER; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 2, 2023** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Saul Pelayo appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment. We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a district court's
summary judgment de novo. See Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.
2004). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pelayo’s retaliation claims fail as the Appellees’ actions in…