Saul Pelayo v. B. Greer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202322-15223California392 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL PELAYO, No. 22-15223

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-04135-RS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

B. GREER; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 2, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Saul Pelayo appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment. We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a district court's

summary judgment de novo. See Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

2004). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pelayo’s retaliation claims fail as the Appellees’ actions in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.