Irina Morris v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202321-56169California1,252 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRINA MORRIS, No. 21-56169

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-00821-SB-GJS v.

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; MEMORANDUM*

DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 15, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,** District Judge.

Irina Morris appeals the district court’s judgment denying her claim that

Aetna Life Insurance Company (Aetna) breached its fiduciary duty under

§ 502(a)(3) of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. §§ 1001, et seq.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.