Peterson

Peterson v. Harris CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2023B315356California6,783 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mori, J.

Filed 6/2/23 Peterson v. Harris CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

SABRINA PETERSON, B315356

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV07836) v.

CLIFFORD HARRIS et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David Sotelo, Judge. Reversed in part and remanded with directions. Berk Brettler, Andrew B. Brettler, Jake A. Camara; Lavely & Singer and Kelsey J. Leeker, for Defendants and Appellants. Ivie McNeill Wyatt Purcell & Diggs, Rodney S. Diggs, for Plaintiff and Respondent. In January 2021, plaintiff Sabrina Peterson posted a video and messages to her Instagram account accusing defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.