Asghar

Asghar v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202321-1290California1,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUDASAR ASGHAR, No. 21-1290 Agency No. Petitioner, A203-681-527 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 21, 2023 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and KOH, Circuit Judges, and McMAHON, District Judge.**

Mudasar Asghar, a native and citizen of Pakistan, appeals from a Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s)

denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not

restate them here. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Colleen McMahon, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.