Azarkman

Azarkman v. Fux CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 6, 2023B312291California7,306 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/6/23 Azarkman v. Fux CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

JERRY YORAM AZARKMAN, B312291

Plaintiff and Appellant,

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV23643) v.

MAURICIO JOFFEE FUX,

Defendant and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert S. Draper, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. Dolan Law Firm, Christopher Dolan, Allison Stone; The Arkin Law Firm and Sharon J. Arkin; Doll Amir Eley, Gregory L. Doll and Lloyd Vu for Plaintiff and Appellant. Winston & Strawn, Jeffrey L. Steinfeld, Kevin P. Simpson for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Jerry Azarkman and his brother, Ron Azarkman,1 have a long-running dispute over the operation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.