United States v. Lucas Buckley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 202322-16248California1,082 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 18 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-16248
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-07811-RS
v. MEMORANDUM*
LUCAS E. BUCKLEY,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
APPROXIMATELY 69,370 BITCOIN
(BTC), BITCOIN GOLD (BTG) BITCOIN
SV (BSV) AND BITCOIN CASH (BCH),
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 8, 2023 San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: MILLER and KOH, Circuit Judges, and LYNN,** District Judge.
In this civil forfeiture case, Claimant-Appellant Lucas Buckley appeals the
district court’s order below granting the government’s motion to strike his claim
for lack of Article III standing. We have jurisdiction to review Buckley’s appeal
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.