Haering

Haering v. County of San Bernardino CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2024D082202California6,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/23/24 Haering v. County of San Bernardino CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KELLY HAERING, D082202

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1934186)

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Bryan F. Foster, Judge. Affirmed. Dordick Law Corporation, Gary A. Dordick, John M. Upton; The Arkin Law Firm, Sharon J. Arkin; Belgum, Fry & Van Allen, Alan A. Carrico, and Garret R. Fry for Plaintiff and Appellant. Silver & Wright, Mahadhi Corzano; Fujii Law Group and John M. Fujii for Defendants and Respondents.

Kelly Haering fell when she stepped in a depression in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.