United States v. Michael Graham
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 202421-10277California1,195 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10277
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:16-cr-01300-DLR-1 v.
MICHAEL SEAN GRAHAM, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 7, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: BERZON, HURWITZ, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Michael Graham appeals his conviction and sentence on 15 counts of wire
and mail fraud involving a foreign-currency investment scheme. We affirm.
1. Graham first argues that the district court violated Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1) when it rejected a plea agreement containing a 20-
month sentence cap. Because Graham did not raise the alleged Rule 11 violation
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1 before the district court, and because such an objection…