Kalamice Piggee v. William Muniz
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KALAMICE K. PIGGEE, No. 22-55770
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-07384-FLA-SK v.
WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 6, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: OWENS, BUMATAY, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Kalamice Piggee, a state criminal defendant, appeals the district court’s denial
of his habeas corpus petition. Piggee alleges that his federal due process rights were
violated when, after a prior determination that Piggee had been restored to
competence to stand trial, the state trial court did not grant Piggee’s subsequent
request for a competency hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 28 U.S.C.…