People v. Agtarap CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2024H049529California6,329 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Charges, Trial, and Sentencing On October 5, 2021, the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office filed a fourth amended information charging Agtarap with 13 criminal counts as follows: two counts of procuring and offering a false or forged instrument (a forged bankruptcy petition) in victim J.M.’s 3 name without his consent (Pen. Code4, § 115, subd. (a); counts 1 and 2); one count of procuring and offering a false or forged instrument (a false continuing disability review report) to the Social Security Administration (SSA) (§ 115, subd. (a); count 3); six counts of grand theft by false pretenses of property belonging to victims M.G., B.C., the SSA, J.M., R.G., and M.M. (§ 487, subd. (a); counts 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, and 13); two counts of grand theft by embezzlement of property belonging to victims M.M. and J.M. (§ 503; counts 7 and 8); one count of second degree commercial burglary by

2 In her opening brief, Agtarap also raised two other issues on appeal as follows: (1) she argued that two of her convictions (Counts 1 and 2) for procuring and offering a false or forged instrument should be reversed as time-barred; and (2) she contended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.