People v. Fallon CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2024B327318California1,992 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lavin, J.

INTRODUCTION

A jury convicted defendant James Steven Fallon of, among other crimes, premeditated, deliberate, and willful attempted murder. The jury also found true allegations that Fallon personally used a firearm and personally inflicted great bodily injury during the attempted murder. A different panel of this division reversed Fallon’s convictions because the trial court did not properly instruct the jury on reasonable doubt and the jury was exposed to a prejudicial email between the prosecutor and a detective that was not admitted as evidence at trial. (People v. Fallon (Dec. 30, 2014, B251619) [nonpub. opn.] (Fallon).) After the matter was remanded to the trial court, Fallon pled no contest to one count of attempted murder, and he admitted that he personally used a firearm during the commission of that offense and that he suffered a prior strike conviction. The remaining charges and allegations, including the premeditation special circumstance allegation, were dismissed. Fallon later filed a petition to vacate his attempted murder conviction under Penal Code1 section 1172.6. After appointing counsel for Fallon, the court denied the petition without issuing an order to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.