Nguyen

Nguyen v. Patterson CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2024A168112California856 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/24 Nguyen v. Patterson CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PHUONG T. NGUYEN,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A168112

v. RYAN JAMES PATTERSON, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC21591803) Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

San Francisco property owner Phuong T. Nguyen brought suit against several private parties and local officials relating to disputes precipitated by her tenant’s alleged damage to and misuse of the property, including through unlawful subletting of hotel-style rooms during the pandemic. She timely appeals an order granting a special motion to strike made by one of the defendants, attorney Ryan James Patterson, who briefly represented the tenant in dealings with local housing enforcement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.